Recent
events in our nation’s legislature have raised the question of who should
manage our public lands. Should the federal government continue to manage and dictate
what can happen on land across the continent from Washington D.C.? In my
opinion they should hand over management of public lands to the state
governments.
An
analysis by the Property and Environment Research Center in Montana, shows that
“on average, states generate more revenue per dollar spent than the federal
government on a variety of land management activities, including timber,
grazing, minerals and recreation.” I realize that in our personal lives
economics isn’t always our first concern when making decisions, but when we are
dealing with government, spending and revenue is important and should be
considered. The numbers in this study are compelling especially when federal
management is losing money every year which adds to the federal deficit, and
the state management of the same activities is profitable by a margin of about
$14 gained for every dollar spent. To me this shows a lack of good choices by
officials who make these decisions. If the forest service sells timber below
cost, how can they hope to keep their revenues in the black and in turn give
relief to the tax payers?
You
may think that the states won’t treat the land as it was intended. The mission
statement of the Bureau of Land Management is “to manage and conserve the
public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations under
our mandate of multiple-use and sustained yield.” I agree that this is how the
land should be used and preserved. However, if this agency is losing money
every year it won’t be sustainable. There is one thing that both sides of the
argument can agree on and that is tourism as a way to sustain the profitability
and even the conservation of these areas. If the states don’t continue to fund
conservation by allocation funds to other budget areas, it would be detrimental
to the land as well as the tourism. The more people that come and experience the
beauty of the West, the greater the desire to preserve it will become. In many
of these areas tourism drives the economy. The states with their fiduciary
responsibility will take an active part in making sure the lands are cared for
and maintained in a way that will benefit visitors and residents for
generations to come.
According
to the BLM, most of the land under their management is located in 12 western
states, including Alaska. They should each be able to control the management of
these lands that are held within their own borders, instead of legislators from
thirty-eight other states deciding what is best for land they may have never
visited. This is not new territory for these states. They each have state trust
lands that they manage.
I
would hope that the government would only give the states access to acquire the
lands and not open any of it for private sales. Losing or restricting access to
our pristine areas would be a loss for our children of the future.
I
wouldn’t take all the land management from the federal government. I think that
they should retain the National Parks and Monuments while giving the Wilderness
areas and forests to the states. Recreational activities as well as hunting and
fishing can continue as the land is renewed and cared for. Who should manage
our public lands? I think the states should be able to manage the public lands
within their borders.
Reference List
Coggin, Will. “Public Lands Debate Marred by Camouflaged
Activists.” http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865625394/Public-lands-debate-marred-by-camouflaged-activists.html
DeMille, David. “Feds, State Leaders Agree on Public
Lands Tourism.” http://www.thespectrum.com/story/news/local/2014/06/09/feds-state-leaders-agree-public-lands-tourism/10256507/
Fretwell, Holly; Regan, Shawn. “Divided Lands: State vs.
Federal Management in the West.” http://perc.org/articles/divided-lands-state-vs-federal-management-west
Regan, Shawn. “The U.S. Department of Land-Hogging.” http://perc.org/articles/us-department-land-hogging
Rogers, Will. “Our Land, Up for Grabs.” http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/02/opinion/our-land-up-for-grabs.html?_r=0
U.S. Department of the Interior. “Mission statement of
the Bureau of Land Management.” http://www.blm.gov/wo/st/en/info/newsroom/2014/october/nr_10_02_2014.html
No comments:
Post a Comment